Skip to main content

What's A Dead Lion Worth?

Can you put a dollar value on a lion? It would be difficult to express the worth of a living lion in monetary terms; there are too many variables. Let’s just go ahead and call a living lion priceless. But how about a dead lion? What’s a dead lion worth?

Luckily for us we can, with a minimum of background information, arrive at a figure that is pretty accurate.

For decades, South Africa maintained a multimillion dollar lion breeding industry, with some 350 facilities scattered throughout the country, housing at any one time between 8,000 and 12,000 captive lions. The lions were sold to zoos, to companies that offered children a chance to pet cubs, to canned hunting operations (where cowardly rich assholes pay to shoot a “ferocious wild beast” that has been caged in a small enclosure for their “hunting” convenience) and lastly, lion skeletons were exported to China for use in traditional medicine.


Captive-Bred Lions
Photo by Karl Ammonn

South Africa was granted special permission for the practice at the 2016 CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) conference held in Johannesburg (go figure), and a quota was set for 800 lions. Upon arrival in China, each carcass was boiled, to remove the last vestiges of meat and gristle, as well as to soften the bone, which was then pulverized into a powder that was rendered into 60 bars of so-called “tiger cake.”

Surely it goes without saying, but in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) tiger cake is made up of powdered bone from, you know, tigers. However, unbeknownst to many consumers of tiger cake, the bone meal is many times that of lions (the skeletons are virtually impossible to tell apart), because tigers are increasingly difficult to come by. (Which is the subject for a whole other conversation, as are the superstitious underpinnings of TCM.)

Chinese importers paid the South African government roughly $1600 per lion carcass. So, South Africa made a tidy profit of approximately $1,280,000 for 800 dead lions. Not a bad chunk of change, but the money spigot has only just been opened. Each of those 60 bars of tiger cake sells for $1000, which translates to a value of $60,000 for each dead lion. Which means that the initial shipment of 800 lion carcasses realized a downstream value of $48 million.

$48 million is an enormous pile of money, even in this cash-bloated country. In the four countries that slurp up the most tiger cake – China, Vietnam, Cambodia and Thailand – $48 million is an amount of money so gigantic it must seem like fiction. Sadly (if that’s the right word), the ordinary impoverished citizens of those countries rarely if ever see a single cent of the dead-lion money. No, that money lines the pockets of a vanishingly small number of old, rich men who, like all rich old men, hoard the stuff like it’s their very reason for existence. Which it usually is.


Tiger Cake 
Photo by Karl Ammonn

In the end, it turns out that lion, after spending it short life caged in squalor and misery is, once it has been shot, worth, minimally, in the neighborhood of $60,000.

But there is some hope on the horizon. On May 2 of this year, the South African government announced that it intends to end its captive breeding industry, and that it will officially oppose the illegal international trade in rhinoceros horn and elephant ivory, two things it has not done before now. They are also going to put a stop to the hunting of caged lions (canned hunts). Granted, they are banning the revolting practice in order to promote a “more authentic hunting industry,”* but at least the pathetic dipshits who engage in the activity will have to actually put down their scotch and get out of their air-conditioned Hummer limos to shoot something magnificent.

Talk with you soon.

 

*ABC News, May 2, 2021.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Steller's Sea Cow - 1768

  Ever heard of Vitus Jonassen Bering? How about Georg Steller? No? Well, Bering was a Danish cartographer and Steller was a German naturalist. They lived in the early 1700s, and worked together for Imperial Russia, under whose auspices they led expeditions to map the Arctic coast of Siberia. In 1741, while they were sailing around between Alaska and Russia, in what would come to be called the Bering Sea, the ship carrying Bering and Steller ran aground during a storm, on the shores of what would come to be called Bering Island. (Vitus Bering was notoriously humble.) The island wasn’t inhabited (by humans), and was a pretty desolate place. (Vitus Bering) Having lost their stores during the wreck, the expedition members were in immediate need to food. The island didn’t offer much in the way of nourishment, but the water around it did, in the form of sea otters and, more importantly, an oceangoing mammal that would be named Steller’s sea cow. (Steller also had a very low opinion ...

Lone Wolf? No Thanks

The “lone wolf” trope has permeated Western culture for what feels like forever (or at least since Reagan was in office). It is meant to connote notions of going it alone and rugged individuality . Lone wolves don’t need anyone’s help to tackle dangerous situations or, indeed, to face any of life’s travails. Lone wolves wear a lot of leather, ride motorcycles sans helmets, can bullseye a bad guy’s noggin from all the way over there, and can kick your ass using any and every type of martial art practiced in the entire history of kicking people for fun and profit. Lone wolves are strong, vigorous, mysterious, and unknowable. Here’s the thing. Being an actual lone wolf – as in an actual wolf that is not a member of an actual pack – pretty much sucks, and our version of the idea is tediously idealized nonsense. The governing reality in the life of wolves (red and gray) is that they are very social animals – the most pack oriented of all canids, with the possible exception of hyena...

Well, That Plan Sucked

Over the course of our long history, we humans have from time to time taken it upon ourselves to designate some animals as pests, and to declare that they must be controlled. Our reasons for wanting to exert our authority over these animals are myriad, but generally boil down to the idea that the animals are either eating or damaging something, and we would prefer that they discontinue doing so. We have attempted to control pests in a bunch of different ways. One of which is the introduction of predator species, in the hope that they will predate upon our pests and send them packing. It’s an idea that looks good on paper, sounds even better around a conference table, but is all too often disastrous in practice. Today we are going to take a look at some of these introduced species (sometimes referred to as “biocontrols”) with an eye toward understanding what they were meant to do versus what they actually did. We’ll begin with one of the most notorious. Cane Toad ( Rhinella mari...