Sherni: Lessons to Be Learned

The newly-released feature Sherni (now streaming on Amazon Prime) is set in the central-Indian state of Madhya Pradesh and was shot almost entirely on locatio in its lush countryside. Starring Vidya Balan, the story centers on newly-minted Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) Vidya Vincent as she confronts the complexities of a dangerous tiger at large in her district.

As directed by Amit Masurkar, the movie comes at the issue of humankind's conflicted relationship with wildlife from every angle - competing government bureaucrats, who run the gamut from unreasonable to ridiculous; candidates for office who use the tiger situation to further their personal political ambitions, while preying on the ignorance of their constituents; starving, impoverished citizens, trapped between governmental ineptitude and the need to graze their livestock; the grieving families of the tiger's victims; scientists from the nearby university trying to understand the motivations behind the tiger's actions; oafish hunters who believe the only solution to a tiger problem is a dead tiger; and greedy land managers who demand that workers keep working the fields despite the risks.

DFO Vincent herself is faced with instances of sexism that look positively American, as she is belittled, talked over, and ignored while men attempt to relegate her to the sidelines. It's very fun to watch her unwavering gaze as she backs down not a single inch. Vidya Balan's wonderfully understated performance as DFO Vincent becomes a kind of backboard off which bounces a series of male buffoons, all of whom seem to hail from India's version of Texas. She fights to the end, because that's what has to be done.

In the end Sherni ("Tigress") is firmly on the side of India's few remaining wild tigers (and its strong women). It doesn't offer any firm solutions, other than to suggest that the tigers (and other large predators world-wide) can be saved if we listen to our experts, do our best to limit the amount of stupid in our governments, and rid the world of cowardly, toxically masculine big-game hunters.

Yeah. I know.

Talk to you soon.

Comments

Fish Smarts

The evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould once suggested that observant aquarium owners might very well know as much if not more about the behavior of tropical fish than do ichthyologists. Indeed, if you have ever owned an aquarium and have wiled away a few pleasant hours watching your fishy tenants go about their fishy business, then you likely understand how right Gould probably was. Among people who keep aquaria, it is no secret that fish exhibit individual personalities, forge useful alliances, and engage in the occasional round of fisticuffs. They also exhibit feats of intelligence that go well beyond what their traditional reputation might warrant. Toward the end of my undergraduate days, I was fortunate enough to spend a few months babysitting a 20 gallon aquarium that was home to an eight-inch tiger oscar ( Astronotus ocellatus ) and a five-inch bristlenose plecostomus ( Ancistrus dolichopterus ). One of my favorite things was to shut off all the lights in my bedroom, ...

Well, That Plan Sucked

Over the course of our long history, we humans have from time to time taken it upon ourselves to designate some animals as pests, and to declare that they must be controlled. Our reasons for wanting to exert our authority over these animals are myriad, but generally boil down to the idea that the animals are either eating or damaging something, and we would prefer that they discontinue doing so. We have attempted to control pests in a bunch of different ways. One of which is the introduction of predator species, in the hope that they will predate upon our pests and send them packing. It’s an idea that looks good on paper, sounds even better around a conference table, but is all too often disastrous in practice. Today we are going to take a look at some of these introduced species (sometimes referred to as “biocontrols”) with an eye toward understanding what they were meant to do versus what they actually did. We’ll begin with one of the most notorious. Cane Toad ( Rhinella mari...

Shark Week Sucks SO Bad

Shark Week on the Discovery Channel has been airing for 36 years. What started as five primetime nights of quality, well-produced documentaries about sharks has since mutated into a ludicrous exercise in avarice. Shark Week has been a cash cow for the Discovery Channel, and the executives there seem hell-bent on doing everything in their power to make sure the cow stays healthy, even if that means alienating their core audience. In the Beginning Back during the first decade or so of Shark Week , the documentaries featured dedicated shark biologists engaging in genuine shark research. We still have some of that today, but we also have an increasing collection of mildly charming, TV-ready, dorks who constantly shout into their respirators, and who may or may not actually be scientists. Additionally, when true scientists do appear they are too often forced to contend with absurd questions, written by TV producers with business degrees, and mouthed at them by an ever-changing gaggle ...

Everyday Biophilia

Search This Blog